The Global Paramedic

05/10/2026

As a paramedic, I fully appreciate how difficult it can be to maintain a good diet when you work shifts.
- Early starts where breakfast happens at 4am.
- Night shifts when your body doesn’t know whether it wants breakfast or dinner.
- Meals eaten late - or missed altogether.
- Caffeine to get through the next few hours.
.....And grabbing whatever is available because you simply haven’t had time to stop.

It’s one of the reasons I created the Shift Worker Nutrition Journal.

And today, I’m really pleased to say it’s officially LIVE!

For the first week only, the journal is available as a digital download for £3.95. After the launch week, it will return to its full price of £5.95.

Working shifts can make maintaining consistent nutrition, hydration and sleep routines incredibly difficult. And this certainly isn’t unique to ambulance staff. Millions of people work outside the traditional 9–5.

The journal has been designed to help shift workers step back and look at their own patterns.

- What and when am I eating?
- Am I drinking enough?
- How much caffeine am I relying on and when?
- How am I sleeping?
- How are my energy levels throughout the shift?
- Are there patterns between my shifts, nutrition, sleep and how I feel?

Most importantly, this isn't about eating perfectly.
It's about awareness. Because when your working hours are anything but normal, the routines that work for someone working Monday–Friday, 9–5 don't necessarily work for you.

I created it with emergency services and healthcare colleagues in mind, but anyone working shifts can use it - including night workers, factory and warehouse teams, aviation, security, drivers, and logistics workers.

If it helps someone recognise a pattern, make a small change or simply think a little more about how they’re fuelling themselves around their shifts, then it’s doing what I designed it to do.

Download the Shift Worker Nutrition Journal here:

https://payhip.com/b/qcz69

And if you know someone who spends their working life battling early starts, nights and constantly changing routines, please share this with them.

KellyParamedic | Nutritional Coach
Revitalise Your Health

Understand your own patterns around food, appetite, energy and sleep.No calorie counting. No rigid meal plans. No judgement.The Shift Worker Nutrition Journal has been created to help you step away from restrictive diets and unrealistic routines. Wor...

28/08/2026

PARAMEDIC TRAINING: HOW DID YOU GET HERE?

The pathway to becoming a paramedic in the UK has changed considerably over the years.

Many experienced paramedics entered the profession through vocational ambulance-service training, including the IHCD Paramedic Award/Certificate.

As paramedic education developed, we saw the introduction of higher-education routes, including the Diploma of Higher Education (DipHE) in Paramedic Science/Practice.

Today, the profession has moved firmly into degree-level education, with BSc (Hons) Paramedic Science/Paramedic Practice forming the standard route towards eligibility for HCPC registration.

But this raises some interesting questions...

🎓 Has changing the academic pathway changed the profession?

🚑 What have we gained from degree-level education?

📚 Is there anything we have lost from the older vocational and ambulance-service training models?

🌍 And how does our pathway compare with paramedic education elsewhere in the world?

Where are you from, and what was YOUR route into the profession?

IHCD?
DipHE?
BSc?
MSc/pre-registration postgraduate route?
Apprenticeship?
Or a completely different pathway outside the UK?

Comment with:

🌍 Country
🎓 Qualification/pathway
🚑 Year you qualified

I'm particularly interested in hearing from paramedics around the world as part of The Global Paramedic project.

Different pathways. Different systems. One profession.

12/08/2026

What does it actually mean to be a paramedic in the UK?

One thing I want to explore through The Global Paramedic is the variation in paramedic scope of practice across the UK.

We have a nationally regulated profession. We have HCPC-registered paramedics, nationally recognised education and professional standards.

Yet the clinical practice of a paramedic can look very different depending on which ambulance service employs them, which role they hold, and what their local governance permits.

Take something as simple as urinalysis.

A paramedic may have been educated and clinically trained to undertake urinalysis, understand the findings and incorporate them into their clinical assessment - yet their particular ambulance service may not recognise urinalysis as part of the operational scope of that role.

So where does scope of practice actually sit?

The College of Paramedics' Scope of Practice guidance is interesting here. It describes scope as the limits of an individual's knowledge, skills and experience, and importantly, states that its guidance does not define a fixed list of clinical procedures a paramedic may perform. Instead, it provides a generic professional scope that can apply across different settings, alongside employer-specific clinical skills and requirements.

The College has also highlighted that paramedics work across an increasingly diverse range of environments - including primary care, urgent care, SDEC, emergency departments, critical care and community settings.

That raises some fascinating questions.

If a paramedic has been appropriately educated, trained and assessed as competent to perform a clinical skill, does the absence of that skill from their employer's operational scope mean the paramedic is no longer capable of performing it?

Or are we actually looking at two different concepts:

Professional capability
vs
Employer-authorised practice?

And how much does your postcode determine your clinical capability?

Because there is a significant difference between:

'A paramedic cannot do this."

and

"This paramedic's employer does not currently permit them to do this in this role."

The College of Paramedics and HCPC position is particularly relevant: the HCPC does not prescribe a finite list of procedures that define paramedic practice. Scope is connected to education, training, competence, experience and professional judgement, while employers have an important role in determining the requirements of particular roles and settings.

So here's the question I want to investigate:

Is UK paramedic scope of practice genuinely national - or does your ambulance Trust determine how much of your professional capability you are actually allowed to use?

I'll be comparing the ambulance services and publishing what I find.

What differences have you experienced?

Have you moved between Trusts and discovered that you could do something in one service that wasn't recognised or permitted in another?

08/08/2026

Who runs the healthcare around the world?

08/08/2026

The Global Paramedic | Who Actually runs healthcare?


One of the questions I keep coming back to when looking at healthcare systems around the world is a simple one:

Who is actually making the decisions?

And, perhaps more importantly…

How much experience do they have of healthcare before they reach the top?

Take Taiwan ...

Its current Health Minister, Dr Chung-Liang Shih, has an extraordinary healthcare career behind him, including experience as an emergency physician, senior medical administrator, Director-General of Medical Affairs, leadership of Taiwan's National Health Insurance Administration and Vice Minister before becoming Minister.

That's a very different career pathway from simply entering politics and being given the health portfolio.

Then look at Singapore

Its Health Minister is not a clinician, but Singapore has developed a very strong professional healthcare leadership structure beneath political leadership. Senior health-system leaders bring substantial experience in healthcare policy, administration and delivery.

Then there is the USA

The American model is fundamentally different again.

The federal Health Secretary is a political appointment, while substantial technical and clinical expertise sits within organisations such as CMS, NIH, CDC and other agencies.

And then we have the UK

The Secretary of State for Health and Social Care is a political appointment, supported by ministers, civil servants, NHS England and the wider NHS leadership structure.

But how much direct operational healthcare experience exists at each level?

And does that matter?

I'm not suggesting that every Health Minister should be a doctor.

Healthcare is too complex for that.

What I am interested in is whether people making major healthcare decisions understand what it is actually like to deliver healthcare.

Have they worked clinically?

Have they managed healthcare services?

Have they experienced workforce shortages?

Have they dealt with patient flow?

Have they seen what happens when policy reaches the ambulance, emergency department, ward, GP practice or community service?

Because there can be a huge difference between designing healthcare policy and delivering healthcare.

Over the coming months, I'm going to break down these structures in much more detail.

🇹🇼 Taiwan
🇸🇬 Singapore
🇺🇸 USA
🇬🇧 UK

I'll look at who sits at the top, their professional backgrounds, how decisions are made, where clinical expertise sits within the system, and how much influence frontline healthcare professionals actually have.

And importantly, I won't simply assume that one model is better.

I'll follow the evidence.

Because if we're serious about improving healthcare, perhaps we should start by asking:

Do the people making policy, running healthcare and redesigning the system actually understand the system they're responsible for?

Andy Burnham Nigel Farage

30/07/2026

Yesterday was a fantastic day for The Global Paramedic.

I had the privilege of spending a few hours with Rob Lawrence, discussing ambulance services, healthcare systems, paramedic education and leadership across both the UK and the USA.

Rob was incredibly generous with his time, openly sharing his experiences from senior NHS leadership and executive roles within US EMS. I came away with plenty to think about and a much broader understanding of how different healthcare models influence the delivery of prehospital care. (and also thought of a load more questions on my way home!)

One thing that particularly interested me was learning more about continuing professional development in the United States. Rob has kindly offered to send me information on their CPD, so I can explore how CPD is delivered and compare it with approaches used elsewhere. I'm really looking forward to diving into that.

Here's is a small overview of what I took away from Rob yesterday.

1️⃣ Healthcare funding and insurance

Rob suggested thinking about US healthcare in much the same way as car insurance - some policies provide far more comprehensive cover than others. One example we discussed was air ambulance services. Many air ambulance providers in the USA operate as for-profit organisations, and depending on a patient's insurance cover, the level of financial responsibility can vary considerably. It was another reminder of how healthcare funding models can directly influence a patient's experience.

2️⃣ Paramedic registration isn't nationally transferable

One fact I found particularly interesting is that, unlike the UK, paramedics generally cannot simply transfer their registration from one state to another. Although many states recognise the National Registry of Emergency Medical Technicians (NREMT), individual state licensing requirements still vary, and moving between states may require additional examinations, verification or other licensing processes before a paramedic can practise. It's another example of how varied EMS systems can be across the United States.

3️⃣ The complexity of practising across state lines

In some areas, a paramedic may begin treating a patient within one state, only to transport them to a hospital in another. Depending on the state and local regulations, it's possible to start the journey practising entirely within your scope of practice and finish it in a jurisdiction where that same intervention may not be authorised. It's a fascinating reminder of just how diverse EMS systems can be across the USA and why understanding governance and regulation is just as important as understanding clinical practice.

4️⃣ Healthcare models and patient choice

Rob summed up one of the biggest differences between the UK and US healthcare systems with a simple question:

"Do you want quick healthcare and treatment options, which can often come with significant medical debt despite having insurance, or do you want to live medical debt-free and be on a waiting list?"*

It's a thought-provoking way of framing two very different healthcare models and the trade-offs that come with each. Particularly as the primary care services in the UK are looking at two tiered models.

Rob also gave me invaluable advice on planning the next stage of The Global Paramedic. Alongside recommending several US states to visit, he suggested three additional countries whose healthcare systems would be well worth exploring. Those recommendations have already helped shape my thinking for 2027, and I'm excited to start planning the journey.

He also encouraged me to attend EMS World Expo 2027 in New Orleans, Louisiana - one of the world's largest gatherings of EMS professionals. It sounds like an incredible opportunity to learn, build relationships and gain further insight into international prehospital care.

Perhaps the message that resonated with me most was this:

"All EMS services are the same. The deployment may differ, the protocols may differ, but everywhere you'll find clinicians doing the job because they genuinely care."

There was so much more discussed than I could possibly capture in one post. I'm incredibly grateful to Rob for giving up his time, sharing his experience so openly, and helping shape the next stage of this project.

Thank you again, Rob.

29/07/2026

Today marks an important milestone in my journey with The Global Paramedic. I am meeting one of the most respected leaders in international EMS, whose career has spanned senior leadership roles in both the NHS and the United States.

Today, I have the privilege of meeting Rob Lawrence for lunch, who has kindly taken time out of his busy schedule to support The Global Paramedic project during his visit to the UK.

Rob has built an extraordinary career spanning military medicine, the NHS and EMS leadership in the United States. A graduate of the Royal Military Academy Sandhurst, he served for 22 years in the Royal Army Medical Corps before moving into senior NHS leadership, including roles as Commissioner of Ambulance Services in the East of England, Director of Operations at the East Anglian Ambulance Service, and Chief Operating Officer for Suffolk within the East of England Ambulance Service.

Today, Rob serves as Director of Strategic Implementation for Pro EMS and Prodigy EMS in Cambridge, Massachusetts, and as Executive Director of the California Ambulance Association. He is also President-Elect of the Academy of International Mobile Healthcare Integration (AIMHI), Chair of the American Ambulance Association State Association Forum, a respected columnist and broadcaster with EMS1, host of the NAEMT Radio podcast, co-host of the EMS Educator Podcast, and an adviser supporting the development of Rwanda's EMS system through the University of Birmingham.

As I continue my independent research into global healthcare systems, paramedic education and the impact different healthcare models have on prehospital care, there are very few people with Rob's breadth of experience across both the UK and US systems.

I'm incredibly grateful that he has agreed to share his knowledge and experiences. Conversations like these are exactly what The Global Paramedic is all about: learning from leaders around the world.

Thank you, Rob, for taking the time to support this project. I’m looking forward to a fascinating conversation.

28/07/2026

This is why I'm inspired to explore healthcare systems around the world, how it impacts patient access and care, and hope my voice will add strength to those trying to support the NHS remaining "free" for all.

"The foundational principle that healthcare should be provided on the basis of need, rather than the ability to pay" - Aneurin "Nye" Bevan, British politician who founded the UK's National Health Service (NHS) in 1948.

28/07/2026

The Global Paramedic | From the NHS to the USA: Why Understanding Healthcare Systems Matters

Now that we've explored the basic structure of the UK's Beveridge healthcare model, it's time to turn our attention to one of the most debated healthcare systems in the world. The United States.

Before making that comparison, however, it's important to recognise what is currently happening within the NHS.

Despite its many challenges, the founding principle of the NHS remains deeply valued by the British public: healthcare should be provided according to clinical need, not a person's ability to pay.

The NHS is under enormous pressure. An ageing population, increasing demand, workforce shortages, chronic disease, social care pressures and years of financial constraint have all contributed to the situation we see today. The question is no longer whether the NHS needs reform - but what that reform should look like.

One of the biggest changes currently underway is the abolition of NHS England, with many of its responsibilities being transferred directly into the Department of Health and Social Care. The Government says this will reduce bureaucracy, simplify leadership and improve accountability, while critics question whether another large-scale structural reorganisation will genuinely improve frontline care. The transition is expected to result in approximately 9,000 roles being removed across NHS England and integrated care boards.

At the same time, the British Medical Association's GP Committee for England has voted overwhelmingly to explore alternative models for general practice, including the possibility of a means-tested subscription-based service operating alongside NHS care. This is not government policy, nor has it been introduced, but the fact it is being actively explored highlights growing concerns about the long-term sustainability of NHS general practice.

If a subscription model were ever introduced, it raises several important questions.

Would those paying additional monthly subscriptions receive any reduction in taxation?

Would faster access become dependent on an individual's ability to pay?

Would healthcare gradually become a two-tier system?

And what happens to the millions of families who simply cannot afford another monthly bill during an ongoing cost-of-living crisis, just because on paper they are over the threshold?

Another concern is that many people simply would not have the option of going private.

Those living with chronic illnesses, multiple long-term conditions or complex medical needs may struggle to obtain comprehensive private medical insurance at an affordable price. Even when cover is available, premiums may be considerably higher, with exclusions, excesses or limits on pre-existing conditions. For many households, private healthcare simply wouldn't be a realistic alternative. If the UK were to move further towards a hybrid model, the road ahead could be particularly difficult for those who need healthcare the most.

The real challenge facing modern healthcare systems is chronic disease.

In the UK, some of the leading causes of disability include low back and neck pain, depression and anxiety, skin conditions, migraine and other long-term health conditions. These illnesses may not always be immediately life-threatening, but they place enormous pressure on healthcare services, reduce quality of life and contribute significantly to sickness absence and economic inactivity.

Mortality presents another challenge. Cardiovascular disease, cancer, dementia, chronic respiratory disease and stroke remain among the leading causes of death in the UK.

Healthcare systems cannot simply become better at treating illness.

They must become better at preventing it.

That means investing in:

• Preventative healthcare
• Early diagnosis
• Primary care
• Community healthcare
• Mental health services
• Social care
• Public health
• Lifestyle medicine
• Health education
• Tackling health inequalities

As I begin exploring healthcare in the United States, I'll be examining how a predominantly insurance-based system compares with the UK's tax-funded model.

How does insurance influence access to care?

How does it affect ambulance services?

What autonomy do paramedics have?

How are hospitals funded?

How are clinicians educated?

And ultimately...

What can both countries learn from each other?

This project isn't about deciding which healthcare system is "best."

It's about understanding why systems differ, what works well, where challenges exist, and how international collaboration can help improve healthcare for patients everywhere and what the UK nation can expect if we enter this system.

If you could change just one thing about the NHS, what would it be?

I'd love to hear your thoughts on this.