16/09/2026
I have written a piece for Netpol's blog that I think many of you will find interesting.
It asks a simple question: what happened to medical masks? Not long ago they were something the NHS asked people at higher risk to wear. That guidance hasn't changed. But under section 157 of the Crime and Policing Act, wearing a mask inside a police-designated protest area is now an offence in itself. Health is a defence you raise after you've been charged, not an exemption.
"Someone masking for an entirely legitimate health reason could end up in a police cell before their reason is even considered. They would then be placed in an enclosed environment with shared air, precisely the risk they were masking to avoid."
And the people most affected are the least likely to show up in the numbers. As I put it in the piece: "Arrest figures won't tell us how many people this law prevents from taking part in public life." If the choice is arrest or unmasking, most of us stay home.
This isn't about opposing what the law is trying to do. It's about asking why achieving that has to mean people who mask to protect their health must take a risk or stay at home.
We have now submitted our evidence to the Joint Committee on Human Rights, and the full report is out shortly. Please read and share.
At 9am on Saturday 25 July, a large part of Dover became somewhere you could be arrested for wearing a mask. Kent Police were expecting a far-right march and a counter-protest. They used a new power, section 157 of the Crime and Policing Act 2026, which came into force on 29 June, to designate an [....