20/10/2026
THE BOW AND STRING THEORY IN HORSES
For decades, the Bow and String Theory has been used to explain how a horse’s back functions. But how accurately does this theory represent the complexity of the horse’s anatomy?
The concept compares the horse’s vertebral column to a bow, with the abdominal muscles acting as the string. When the abdominal muscles contract, they can contribute to lifting and flexing the back, while other muscular forces influence extension.
So, is the theory correct?
There is certainly scientific evidence supporting aspects of it. We know the abdominal muscles contribute to spinal movement and stability, that head and neck position can influence the back, and that the vertebral column responds to forces generated throughout the body.
However, the theory also has limitations.
A horse is not a mechanical bow. Its spine consists of numerous individual vertebrae capable of moving in three dimensions, supported by an incredibly complex network of muscles, ligaments, tendons and fascia.
The theory also struggles to adequately explain the influence of the pelvis, lumbosacral junction and the multiple pathways through which forces are transmitted throughout the body.
And this is where I think we need to be careful.
The Bow and String Theory has heavily influenced how we interpret correct movement in horses. We often hear phrases like “lift the back”, “engage the core” and “work over the topline”.
But does a rounded back automatically mean the horse is functioning correctly? Does a lowered head mean the abdominal muscles are properly engaged? And is spinal extension necessarily a bad thing?
Not necessarily.
Spinal extension is a normal and necessary part of locomotion, just as flexion is. A healthy back needs the ability to move, stabilise and adapt to the forces placed upon it.
Through anatomical dissection, we can appreciate just how interconnected these structures really are. The abdominal muscles aren’t one continuous string, and the back muscles aren’t simply cables running along the spine. Their architecture, attachments and relationships are far more complex.
The Bow and String Theory isn’t necessarily wrong, but it is incomplete and it also didn’t account for the relationship to the limbs.
It remains a useful model for understanding certain mechanical relationships, but we should be cautious about using it to explain every aspect of spinal function or to determine what correct movement should look like.
Science should evolve as our understanding evolves.
Perhaps instead of trying to make the horse fit the theory, we should be asking whether the theory truly explains what we’re seeing in the horse. Every horse is an individual and the anatomy varies wildly as we see in dissections.
The photo below is of a broodmare whose prep***c tendon ruptured 4 months before foaling. She lived for 10 months total after the foal was safely delivered, a miracle on its own. Just 10 months for the tensegrity chain to be broken via the pre p***c tendon and then topline vanished. It wasn’t a food problem, it was a functional mechanical problem. Tensegrity had been lost. Muscles need activation to stay functional, both in the nerves and the vascular system. When I see muscles wasted away the tissues colour is light pink from poor vascularisation, this indicates the muscles been functioning poorly. Well innervated and vascularised muscle looks like a deep red, think prime fillet steak. You can clearly see her pelvis has fallen to an anterior tilt because the prep***c tendon had ruptured loosing tension on the ventral chain. The video of her dissection is available on patreon.
https://www.patreon.com/Becks_nairn/posts/prepublic-tendon-136347818?utm_medium=clipboard_copy&utm_source=copyLink&utm_campaign=postshare_creator&utm_content=join_link
https://www.patreon.com/Becks_nairn/posts/todays-16-year-135886244?utm_medium=clipboard_copy&utm_source=copyLink&utm_campaign=postshare_creator&utm_content=join_link
Tensegrity is an inter connected chain in the horse and one ventral or dorsal line is not better than the other. Extremes are not good for horses in my opinion, examples would be absolute elevation(vertical riding) and on the forehand peanut rolling(western pleasure) you should develop the ventral and dorsal lines in respect for each other, each with unique benefits to the body.
When we look at the body before rigor has set in, in fresh dissection we see how everything is tensioned. Agonist and antagonist, flexion and extension, dorsal and ventral flexion ect…..the yin and yang of the body.
It’s a beautiful piece of organic engineering. I go into this subject further in my book, it’s such a large topic.
If you would like to read the science I will list the studies below.
1. Van Weeren, P. R. & Haussler, K. K. (2010). Science overview: Development of a structural and functional understanding of the equine back. Equine Veterinary Journal. A particularly valuable review of historical models, including the bow-and-string concept and its limitations.
2. Slijper, E. J. (1946). Comparative biologic-anatomical investigations on the vertebral column and spinal musculature of mammals. Proceedings of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences. Foundational work associated with the modern bow-and-string model.
3. Stubbs, N. C., Hodges, P. W., Jeffcott, L. B., et al. (2006). Functional anatomy of the caudal thoracolumbar and lumbosacral spine in the horse. Equine Veterinary Journal, Supplement 36, 393–399.
4. Zaneb, H., Peham, C. & Stanek, C. (2013). Functional anatomy and biomechanics of the equine thoracolumbar spine: A review. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 37, 380–389.
5. Baudisch et al. (2024). Computed tomographic study analysing functional biomechanics in the thoracolumbar spine of horses with and without spinal pathology. Anatomia, Histologia, Embryologia.
6. Baudisch et al. (2025 volume; published online 2024). Influence of surgical intervention at the level of the dorsal spinous processes on the biomechanics of the equine thoracolumbar spine. Equine Veterinary Journal. This experimental study adds insight into spinal movement and the role of associated soft tissues.